estout after xtmixed and logged variances

[francesca guadagno]

Dear all,

I am trying to make a table with estout after xtmixed and I have seen in some old posts that it was suggested to transform the logged variances of the random-effects part by using the option: transform(#*: exp(@) exp(@))

I am wondering if exponentiation of coefficients done in this way is correct or if I should transform the variances rather than the coefficients.

Thanks in advance for your help,
Francesca