Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interpretation of panel unit root test using -multipurt- command

    I am trying to find the presence of unit root or otherwise in my variables using the -multipurt- command, especially the CIPS test suggested by Pesaran (2007). However, I find that at lag 0, my variable is I(0), whereas it is I(1) at deeper lags. In this case, should I treat the variable as I(0) or I(1)?

    This is going to be useful in deciding whether I proceed with a Johansen cointegration test (which requires all the series to be I(1) or a bounds-based Cointegration test as suggested by Pesaran, Sin, and Smith (2001), which is suitable in case we have a mix of I(0) and I(1) variables. The code and the results are as follows.
    Code:
    multipurt Stab_Low_T, lags(2)
    Code:
    First and Second Generation Panel Unit Root Tests
    
     Variables tested:           Stab_Low_T
     Group variable:             ID
     Number of groups:           39
     Total # of observations:    526+
     Average # of observations:  13.56+
     Panel is unbalanced and has gaps
     + Full sample statistics prior to testing.
    
    ----------------------------------------------------
     (A) Maddala and Wu (1999) Panel Unit Root test (MW)
    ----------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------
                 |     Specification without trend
    -------------+--------------------------------------
        Variable |  lags   chi_sq   p-value
    -------------+--------------------------------------
      Stab_Low_T |    0   634.984     0.000
      Stab_Low_T |    1   623.691     0.000
      Stab_Low_T |    2   190.263     0.000
    ----------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------
                 |     Specification with trend
    -------------+--------------------------------------
        Variable |  lags   chi_sq   p-value
    -------------+--------------------------------------
      Stab_Low_T |    0   318.359     0.000
      Stab_Low_T |    1   358.784     0.000
      Stab_Low_T |    2   211.316     0.000
    ----------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------
     (B) Pesaran (2007) Panel Unit Root test (CIPS)
    ----------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------
                 |     Specification without trend
    -------------+--------------------------------------
        Variable |  lags   Zt-bar   p-value     t-bar
    -------------+--------------------------------------
      Stab_Low_T |    0    -6.126     0.000        .
      Stab_Low_T |    1    -1.321     0.093        .
      Stab_Low_T |    2     4.843     1.000        .
    ----------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------
                 |     Specification with trend
    -------------+--------------------------------------
        Variable |  lags   Zt-bar   p-value     t-bar
    -------------+--------------------------------------
      Stab_Low_T |    0    -7.658     0.000        .
      Stab_Low_T |    1    -0.664     0.253        .
      Stab_Low_T |    2     7.498     1.000        .
    ----------------------------------------------------
     Null for MW and CIPS tests: series is I(1).
     MW test assumes cross-section independence.
     CIPS test assumes cross-section dependence is in 
          form of a single unobserved common factor.
    
     -multipurt- uses Scott Merryman's -xtfisher- and 
          Piotr Lewandowski's -pescadf-.


    Thanks in anticipation of an useful suggestion.

    Regards
    pankaj

  • #2
    Any replies or suggestions, please.

    Thanks and regards
    pankaj

    Comment


    • #3
      Cross-posted at https://stats.stackexchange.com/ques...-test-in-stata

      Please note our request to tell us about cross-posting.

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear Prof. Cox,

        I do take note of your remark and will be open about cross-posting in the future. Further, in case my question gets answered on Stack Exchange, I would post a cross-reference to the same on Statalist.

        Thanks
        pankaj

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't work in this territory, as you may know. My guess is that a reply here is more likely.

          Comment


          • #6
            The link to my cross-posting of the issue to Stack Exchange is here.
            stats.stackexchange.com/questions/663322/interpretation-of-panel-unit-root-test-in-stata?noredirect=1#comment1250142_663322

            However, further insights and suggestions on the question would certainly be of immense help.

            Regards

            Comment

            Working...
            X