Dear Joao Santos Silva and Tom Zylkin
I am using the latest version of ppml_fe_bias to estimate the anticiatory and phased-in effects of PTAs. However, the command produces the bias corrected coefficient estimates (β) and their standard errors (SE), It does not report 95% CI. In my case, I want to plot treatment leads and lags of PTAs along with their 95% CI's, I am not sure how to obtain 95% CI after ppml_fe_bias. I can obtain the upper and lower limit using CI=β± 1.96×SE, but it would be an hectic exercise in my case.
Is there any way to obtain 95% CIs after ppml_fe_bias and If you can show me the code how to plot treatment leads and lags estimates along with the 95% CI, that would be really helpful.
Thanks and regards,
(Ridwan)
I am using the latest version of ppml_fe_bias to estimate the anticiatory and phased-in effects of PTAs. However, the command produces the bias corrected coefficient estimates (β) and their standard errors (SE), It does not report 95% CI. In my case, I want to plot treatment leads and lags of PTAs along with their 95% CI's, I am not sure how to obtain 95% CI after ppml_fe_bias. I can obtain the upper and lower limit using CI=β± 1.96×SE, but it would be an hectic exercise in my case.
Is there any way to obtain 95% CIs after ppml_fe_bias and If you can show me the code how to plot treatment leads and lags estimates along with the 95% CI, that would be really helpful.
Thanks and regards,
(Ridwan)
Comment