Hello everyone,
I am confused about interpreting the coefficients of two continuous interaction terms. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help me understand the meaning of these coefficients.
Does it imply that the quota, on its own, has a more influential effect compared to when trust in society increases or trust lose its effect with the presence of formal rules? In column 2, when trust is interacted with the rule of law, trust is no longer significant, and the coefficient of the interaction term is smaller than that of the rule of law. I am uncertain if this suggests that trust works better in conjunction with effective regulatory institutions in society, or if it means that when regulatory institutions are efficient, trust becomes less impactful or even redundant. Could you please clarify this?
I am confused about interpreting the coefficients of two continuous interaction terms. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help me understand the meaning of these coefficients.
Does it imply that the quota, on its own, has a more influential effect compared to when trust in society increases or trust lose its effect with the presence of formal rules? In column 2, when trust is interacted with the rule of law, trust is no longer significant, and the coefficient of the interaction term is smaller than that of the rule of law. I am uncertain if this suggests that trust works better in conjunction with effective regulatory institutions in society, or if it means that when regulatory institutions are efficient, trust becomes less impactful or even redundant. Could you please clarify this?
Comment