Hi,
I've done a meta-analysis of relative receipt of a cardiac intervention (PCI) between people with and without kidney disease ie a binary outcome as an OR. I've drawn some funnel plots to look qualitatively at potential small study size effects and wasn't planning to use a quantitative test as a) there is marked heterogeneity between effect estimates and I have only 20(ish) studies in the meta-analysis and b) the variance estimator of the logOR is statistically dependent on the estimated log OR so most tests will be anti-conservative.
I've now read that the arscine transformation is the best option, and a reasonable one, for this form of data - specifically the AS-Thompson test.
I can't however find any information on how to do the AS-Thompson test using STATA and wondered if anyone might point me in the right direction.
Unclear what data might be helpful for advice re this, so I haven't added anything for now but of course can do (with suggestions please!).
Thanks so much/apologies if the above is rubbish(!)
I've done a meta-analysis of relative receipt of a cardiac intervention (PCI) between people with and without kidney disease ie a binary outcome as an OR. I've drawn some funnel plots to look qualitatively at potential small study size effects and wasn't planning to use a quantitative test as a) there is marked heterogeneity between effect estimates and I have only 20(ish) studies in the meta-analysis and b) the variance estimator of the logOR is statistically dependent on the estimated log OR so most tests will be anti-conservative.
I've now read that the arscine transformation is the best option, and a reasonable one, for this form of data - specifically the AS-Thompson test.
I can't however find any information on how to do the AS-Thompson test using STATA and wondered if anyone might point me in the right direction.
Unclear what data might be helpful for advice re this, so I haven't added anything for now but of course can do (with suggestions please!).
Thanks so much/apologies if the above is rubbish(!)
Comment