edit: i figured it out hehe.
I ran the example from the GMM documentation, specifically "example 1" about linear regression using GMM.
and i got identical results.
I noticed that that the predicted values I got from `predict ... , xb` are different between the gmm one and the regress one. I further noticed that the GMM predicted values is the OLS one minus the constant. Here some example of the predicted values I got:
.
.
why are they different?
Thanks in advance.
I ran the example from the GMM documentation, specifically "example 1" about linear regression using GMM.
Code:
. gmm (mpg- {xb: weight length}- {b0}), instruments(weight length)
. regress mpg weight length, vce(robust)
Code:
. gmm (mpg- {xb: weight length}- {b0}), instruments(weight length)
Step 1
Iteration 0: GMM criterion Q(b) = 475.4138
Iteration 1: GMM criterion Q(b) = 2.696e-20
Iteration 2: GMM criterion Q(b) = 2.622e-27
Step 2
Iteration 0: GMM criterion Q(b) = 4.001e-28
Iteration 1: GMM criterion Q(b) = 1.368e-31
note: model is exactly identified.
GMM estimation
Number of parameters = 3
Number of moments = 3
Initial weight matrix: Unadjusted Number of obs = 74
GMM weight matrix: Robust
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
| Coefficient std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
weight | -.0038515 .0019472 -1.98 0.048 -.0076679 -.0000351
length | -.0795935 .0677532 -1.17 0.240 -.2123873 .0532003
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
/b0 | 47.88487 7.506024 6.38 0.000 33.17334 62.59641
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instruments for equation 1: weight length _cons
Code:
. regress mpg weight length, vce(robust)
Linear regression Number of obs = 74
F(2, 71) = 55.38
Prob > F = 0.0000
R-squared = 0.6614
Root MSE = 3.4137
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
mpg | Coefficient std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
weight | -.0038515 .0019879 -1.94 0.057 -.0078152 .0001122
length | -.0795935 .0691697 -1.15 0.254 -.217514 .0583271
_cons | 47.88487 7.662958 6.25 0.000 32.60537 63.16438
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
| mpg | weight | length | gmm | ols |
| 22 | 2,930 | 186 | -26.08 | 21.79 |
| 17 | 3,350 | 173 | -26.67 | 21.21 |
why are they different?
Thanks in advance.

Comment