Hello,
I use the NRI package from Mark Lunt (net from http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/mark.lunt).
I am calculating the categorical NRI for the new risk factor "plaqueburden". I set the risk thresholds at 5%, 10% and 15%.
I use the following syntax:
nri priorCVD plaqueburden sex age smk lpa diabetes CVDinfamily, at(0.05 0.10 0.15)
Results are as follows:
"In subjects with priorCVD == 1, 18.64% had increased probabilities
In subjects with priorCVD == 1, 15.25% had decreased probabilities
In subjects with priorCVD == 0, 6.07% had increased probabilities
In subjects with priorCVD == 0, 10.86% had decreased probabilities
Net Reclassification Improvement for plaqueburden = 0.0818
Standard Error = 0.0542
z = 1.5109
P-value (one-sided) = 0.0654
P-value (two-sided) = 0.1308"
However, I have trouble obtaining the 95% CI. Would very much appreciate if anyone could provide the correct syntax.
I use the NRI package from Mark Lunt (net from http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/mark.lunt).
I am calculating the categorical NRI for the new risk factor "plaqueburden". I set the risk thresholds at 5%, 10% and 15%.
I use the following syntax:
nri priorCVD plaqueburden sex age smk lpa diabetes CVDinfamily, at(0.05 0.10 0.15)
Results are as follows:
"In subjects with priorCVD == 1, 18.64% had increased probabilities
In subjects with priorCVD == 1, 15.25% had decreased probabilities
In subjects with priorCVD == 0, 6.07% had increased probabilities
In subjects with priorCVD == 0, 10.86% had decreased probabilities
Net Reclassification Improvement for plaqueburden = 0.0818
Standard Error = 0.0542
z = 1.5109
P-value (one-sided) = 0.0654
P-value (two-sided) = 0.1308"
However, I have trouble obtaining the 95% CI. Would very much appreciate if anyone could provide the correct syntax.
Comment