Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Random effects panel data

    Hi, I am fairly new to Stata and statisitcs overall. For my thesis I am conducting a random effects panel data. With T much larger than N. I am wondering whether I need to be testing for autocorrelation, heteroskedasticty, cross-sectional dependence, and multicollinearity. Now my question is whether there are other important things I am overlooking or I am doing things wrong? I tested for autocorrelation using a Woolridge test xtserial. I am wondering how to test for heteroskedasiticty in my model. Cross-sectional dependence using a Breusch-Pagan LM test xttest2. Multicollinearity using a VIF test. Hopefully someone can guid me into the right direction. As for me the information on the internet looks quite overwhelming and contradictory, and I have the feeling I am doing entirely wrong. Thanks in advance!

  • #2
    I think I need to test for Heteroskedasticity using a Breusch-Pagan test > estate hettest ?

    Comment


    • #3
      xtscc will you give you Dkraay errors, which adjust for hetero/autocorr/spatial corr (a type of cluster error) and is well suited to the data (small N, large T).

      ignore multicollinearity, unless you suspect you've got a real problem.

      HTML Code:
      http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/x/xtscc_paper

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by George Ford View Post
        xtscc will you give you Dkraay errors, which adjust for hetero/autocorr/spatial corr (a type of cluster error) and is well suited to the data (small N, large T).

        ignore multicollinearity, unless you suspect you've got a real problem.

        HTML Code:
        http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/x/xtscc_paper
        Thanks for your response! Should I test for the issues or should I just use the Driscoll-Kraay standard errors?

        Comment


        • #5
          I wouldn't bother. You've fixed any problems that could arise.

          Comment


          • #6
            Oke, thanks for your help!

            Comment

            Working...
            X