Hi there,
I am studying the effects of a subsidy on sustainable investment for a large sample of firms, using cross-sectional data. The subsidy was awarded to certain firms based on the awarding authority’s own assignment mechanism.
I am currently using PSM methods, estimating pscores with a set of covariates. However, one of the important covariates (firm size) is likely impacted by the subsidy itself, but is also an important predictor of the grant assignment - by economic intuition. What can I do to deal with this endogeneity problem? I can achieve an estimate by including firm size as a covariate in the binary choice model (probit), but might a structural equations approach work here instead?
Any help is much appreciated.
I am studying the effects of a subsidy on sustainable investment for a large sample of firms, using cross-sectional data. The subsidy was awarded to certain firms based on the awarding authority’s own assignment mechanism.
I am currently using PSM methods, estimating pscores with a set of covariates. However, one of the important covariates (firm size) is likely impacted by the subsidy itself, but is also an important predictor of the grant assignment - by economic intuition. What can I do to deal with this endogeneity problem? I can achieve an estimate by including firm size as a covariate in the binary choice model (probit), but might a structural equations approach work here instead?
Any help is much appreciated.
Comment