Dear members,
I would like to have some help regarding a model I decided to use. I have still some doubts. I hope someone might guide me. I have not found so much in the blog. I hope someone might read and give me a help.
I attach to the post the main data and the do-file. I want to perform the Simar & Wilson (2007) double bootstrap to analyse the efficiency of schools (simarwilson). I installed it as well as "ftruncreg".
I have 4 outputs, 5 inputs, 9 environmental variables (some dummy variables). Only those 9 enters as independent variables. The model is input orientation, variable returns to scale, algorithm 2 meaning the efficiency scores are computed internally.
I have only 1 year as condition. I added the followings: twosided reps(1000) bcreps(100) invert tebc(eff_vrs_o) level(95) dots
My first question is related a bit on the code and then, the intepretation of the output. I read the help file but I have still some doubts. I added twosided as notwosided is not reccomended with Algorithm 2. Given that the command sets internallity nounit, I did not add such piece of code and let the model run.
I added invert and the estimated efficiency scores are inverted. Larger efficiency scores indicate inefficiency for the input-oriented model (what I have).
- Does the model consider only the environmental variables as independent or in the truncation regression, all variables (hence also outputs and inputs) are considered as independent?
- the etimated after the second loop of bootstrap (the estimates bias-corrected from the truncation regression) should be inverted or those values are already the final ones?
- Once I add my last input (school_size), the bootstrap takes a while (more than 2h) and Stata, somehow, does not respond anylonger. What happens? Does someone have an explanation for it?
- Stata outcome shows me "inefficient if eff_vrs_o > 1". I use summarize to see the values of the bias-corrected and all values, also minimum are above 1. This confuses me a bit because, unless I interpreted incorrectly the help file, "...for
(regular) scores within (0,1], the default (twosided) is to use a two-sided truncated regression model and to sample from the two-sided truncated normal distribution. With twosided, the procedure hence considers that input-oriented (Farrell) efficiency scores are not only less than or equal to 1 but also strictly positive..."
I would really appreciate if someone who has used or has worked with this model, might help me.
Thank you
I would like to have some help regarding a model I decided to use. I have still some doubts. I hope someone might guide me. I have not found so much in the blog. I hope someone might read and give me a help.
I attach to the post the main data and the do-file. I want to perform the Simar & Wilson (2007) double bootstrap to analyse the efficiency of schools (simarwilson). I installed it as well as "ftruncreg".
I have 4 outputs, 5 inputs, 9 environmental variables (some dummy variables). Only those 9 enters as independent variables. The model is input orientation, variable returns to scale, algorithm 2 meaning the efficiency scores are computed internally.
I have only 1 year as condition. I added the followings: twosided reps(1000) bcreps(100) invert tebc(eff_vrs_o) level(95) dots
My first question is related a bit on the code and then, the intepretation of the output. I read the help file but I have still some doubts. I added twosided as notwosided is not reccomended with Algorithm 2. Given that the command sets internallity nounit, I did not add such piece of code and let the model run.
I added invert and the estimated efficiency scores are inverted. Larger efficiency scores indicate inefficiency for the input-oriented model (what I have).
- Does the model consider only the environmental variables as independent or in the truncation regression, all variables (hence also outputs and inputs) are considered as independent?
- the etimated after the second loop of bootstrap (the estimates bias-corrected from the truncation regression) should be inverted or those values are already the final ones?
- Once I add my last input (school_size), the bootstrap takes a while (more than 2h) and Stata, somehow, does not respond anylonger. What happens? Does someone have an explanation for it?
- Stata outcome shows me "inefficient if eff_vrs_o > 1". I use summarize to see the values of the bias-corrected and all values, also minimum are above 1. This confuses me a bit because, unless I interpreted incorrectly the help file, "...for
(regular) scores within (0,1], the default (twosided) is to use a two-sided truncated regression model and to sample from the two-sided truncated normal distribution. With twosided, the procedure hence considers that input-oriented (Farrell) efficiency scores are not only less than or equal to 1 but also strictly positive..."
I would really appreciate if someone who has used or has worked with this model, might help me.
Thank you
Comment