Hello, I am working to analyse the study: Contract farming and rural transformation: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin by Arouna et al (2021). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102626
I am currently trying to reproduce Panel B OLS (1) and (2) of Table 5: Treatment effects on farming contract [T-C] by using a simple OLS model provided by researchers. It shows the treatment effect of the contract on yield (kg/ha).
The code I have typed in Stata is below:
// For OLS (1) which does not include household covariates
reg ryield treated
xi: regress arrond treated
di 479.3533 + _b[treated]
// For OLS (2), which includes household covariates
reg ryield treated
reg treated hhsize_15 age_15 rice_exp_15 sex_15 primeduc_15 agric_15 rice_forma_15 assoc_15 arrond
di 479.3533 + _b[hhsize_15] + _b[age_15] + _b[rice_exp_15] + _b[sex_15] + _b[primeduc_15] + _b[agric_15] + _b[rice_forma_15] + _b[assoc_15] + _b[arrond] // OLS(2)
Compared to Table 5, I got similar outcomes of treatment effect but not the same. In addition, I could not get any similar standard errors and r-squared. Do you recognise any mistakes in the command I used? I assume I am not correctly adding arrondissement fixed effect or idiosyncratic error term orthnogonal to treatment.
I am new to Stata and I am looking forward to hearing back kind response! Thank you.
I am currently trying to reproduce Panel B OLS (1) and (2) of Table 5: Treatment effects on farming contract [T-C] by using a simple OLS model provided by researchers. It shows the treatment effect of the contract on yield (kg/ha).
The code I have typed in Stata is below:
// For OLS (1) which does not include household covariates
reg ryield treated
xi: regress arrond treated
di 479.3533 + _b[treated]
// For OLS (2), which includes household covariates
reg ryield treated
reg treated hhsize_15 age_15 rice_exp_15 sex_15 primeduc_15 agric_15 rice_forma_15 assoc_15 arrond
di 479.3533 + _b[hhsize_15] + _b[age_15] + _b[rice_exp_15] + _b[sex_15] + _b[primeduc_15] + _b[agric_15] + _b[rice_forma_15] + _b[assoc_15] + _b[arrond] // OLS(2)
Compared to Table 5, I got similar outcomes of treatment effect but not the same. In addition, I could not get any similar standard errors and r-squared. Do you recognise any mistakes in the command I used? I assume I am not correctly adding arrondissement fixed effect or idiosyncratic error term orthnogonal to treatment.
I am new to Stata and I am looking forward to hearing back kind response! Thank you.
Comment