Hi there,
I'd like to output and include estimates of Tau2 within a forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis with a number of subgroups.
I am using the following code:
And the resulting forest plot is attached. This seems to provide what I want but the presented estimates of Tau2 are not consistent with the estimated values (see subgroup labelled 3).
The estimates of tau are not included in the STATA window output (I think because of the subgroups) but according to the below commands these are:
Can anyone able to advise what is going on here?
Is it also:
- possible to include the CI for Tau2 within the forest plot?
- edit the presentation of the pooled effect estimate to present the CI with/without the HKSJ adjustment within the same plot (much like the presentation of prediction intervals), or otherwise improve presentation when the HKSJ adjusted CIs are so wide as is the case in subgroup 3?
Many thanks for any help!
Alex
I'd like to output and include estimates of Tau2 within a forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis with a number of subgroups.
I am using the following code:
Code:
ipdmetan, study(StudyName) rfdist re(reml,hksj) by(Int,force) npts forest( astext(65) textsize(90) boxsca(30) effect(Std mean difference) xlabel(-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5, format(%5.1fc)) cirange(-1.5 1.5) range(-1.5 1.5) graphregion(color(white)) ciopts(lcolor(black) lw(thin)) favours(Favours intervention # Favours control) hetinfo(tausq isq pvalue ) extraline(yes)) saving(AD3m.dta,replace): reg scoreH BLRandTrtID0 BL_score i.BLGender0 BLAge if Timepoint == 2
The estimates of tau are not included in the STATA window output (I think because of the subgroups) but according to the below commands these are:
Code:
matrix list r(bystats)
Code:
1: 3: 4: 5: 8:
reml_hksj reml_hksj reml_hksj reml_hksj reml_hksj
eff .14305875 -.34760726 -.02324482 -.08602197 -.07699708
se_eff .28624069 .39736611 .19202394 .06818284 .03510469
eff_lci -.41796269 -5.3966224 -.39960483 -.95236711 -.22804039
eff_uci .70408019 4.7014079 .35311519 .78032316 .07404623
npts 34 117 74 97 355
crit 1.959964 12.706205 1.959964 12.706205 4.3026527
z .49978482 . -.12105169 . .
t . -.87477833 . -1.2616367 -2.1933556
df . 1 . 1 2
pvalue .6172266 .54245854 .9036501 .42667879 .15955421
tausq 0 .24239245 0 0 0
tsq_lci . 0 . 0 0
tsq_uci . 40.146095 . 3.6930345 .36962275
rflci . . . . -.52304451
rfuci . . . . .36905035
Can anyone able to advise what is going on here?
Is it also:
- possible to include the CI for Tau2 within the forest plot?
- edit the presentation of the pooled effect estimate to present the CI with/without the HKSJ adjustment within the same plot (much like the presentation of prediction intervals), or otherwise improve presentation when the HKSJ adjusted CIs are so wide as is the case in subgroup 3?
Many thanks for any help!
Alex
Comment