Hi all,
I am looking to understand if my use case falls outside of the scope of a Heckman correction. Thank you in advance for reading this post and providing any guidance!
I am working on a study which considers how the overconfidence of a management team may affect firm performance. We use a proxy derived from voluntarily issued earnings forecasts by firm management:
Reviewer feedback suggests that sample selection issues may be a problem for our estimation, as not all firms opt to issue forecasts - and thus we can only compute our overconfidence proxy for these firms. A suggestion was to estimate a two-stage Heckman model to correct for the sample selection bias. However, in theory and practise I only see use of the Heckman model to correct for sample selection bias due to the dependent variable. I only find one case which matches our own: an implementation of a Heckman model to correct for sample selection of an independent variable (Wang et al.; 2008).
I am worried that the Heckman model may be the wrong tool for our case, and am hoping for some feedback regarding this. Finally, I wonder how much I should be concerned about this sample selection issue if I do not wish to generalise my findings outside of those firms which opt provide forecasts?
Thank you for considering my questions, I am deeply appreciative of the thoughtful and considered feedback freely given on this forum. Your contributions are sincerely appreciated.
Ayrton
References:
Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143-159.
I am looking to understand if my use case falls outside of the scope of a Heckman correction. Thank you in advance for reading this post and providing any guidance!
I am working on a study which considers how the overconfidence of a management team may affect firm performance. We use a proxy derived from voluntarily issued earnings forecasts by firm management:
We are using a fixed effects panel regression with robust standard errors. We control the necessary industry, year and firm effects, and run several robustness checks.
Firm performance i,t = overconfidence i, t-1 + [control variables]i, t-1
Reviewer feedback suggests that sample selection issues may be a problem for our estimation, as not all firms opt to issue forecasts - and thus we can only compute our overconfidence proxy for these firms. A suggestion was to estimate a two-stage Heckman model to correct for the sample selection bias. However, in theory and practise I only see use of the Heckman model to correct for sample selection bias due to the dependent variable. I only find one case which matches our own: an implementation of a Heckman model to correct for sample selection of an independent variable (Wang et al.; 2008).
I am worried that the Heckman model may be the wrong tool for our case, and am hoping for some feedback regarding this. Finally, I wonder how much I should be concerned about this sample selection issue if I do not wish to generalise my findings outside of those firms which opt provide forecasts?
Thank you for considering my questions, I am deeply appreciative of the thoughtful and considered feedback freely given on this forum. Your contributions are sincerely appreciated.
Ayrton
References:
Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143-159.
Comment