Dear Statalists,
I am doing dominance analysis (using domin-ado from SSC by Luchman1 in Stata 16.1) for the first time and regarding this 3 questions arised which I hope some of you can help me with.
1) My dataset contains imputed values. I was wondering, if using these imputed values in dominance analysis can cause any problems? Are there any arguments against using imputed values in dominance analysis?
I am using following command:
3) Also: Is R2 still a valid indicator for goodnes of fit after doing dominance analysis with fixed effects (if possible)?
Can any of you help me with these issues?
Thank you in advance!
Best wishes,
Hannah
1Luchman, Joseph, 2021: Determining relative importance in Stata using dominance analysis: domin and domme. The Stata Journal 21,2: 510-538. DOI: 10.1177/1536867X211025837. (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1536867X211025837)
I am doing dominance analysis (using domin-ado from SSC by Luchman1 in Stata 16.1) for the first time and regarding this 3 questions arised which I hope some of you can help me with.
1) My dataset contains imputed values. I was wondering, if using these imputed values in dominance analysis can cause any problems? Are there any arguments against using imputed values in dominance analysis?
I am using following command:
mi estimate, post: domin dependvar independvar1 independvar2, reg(reg, abs(independvar3)) fitstat(e(r2_p))2) Moreover I was wondering if I can consider in dominance analysis that my model contains fixed effects? Explicit: Can I use the regular regress-command with fixed effects as an option for dominance analysis as well? See command above.
3) Also: Is R2 still a valid indicator for goodnes of fit after doing dominance analysis with fixed effects (if possible)?
Can any of you help me with these issues?
Thank you in advance!
Best wishes,
Hannah
1Luchman, Joseph, 2021: Determining relative importance in Stata using dominance analysis: domin and domme. The Stata Journal 21,2: 510-538. DOI: 10.1177/1536867X211025837. (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1536867X211025837)
Comment