Hello all
Investigating the influence of Foreign directors on firm performance I am utilising a fixed effects model. Having found an aggregate effect for all directors across all firms around the UK I want to focus on those in London, and see if they improve firm performance at a greater level.
As expected London location is time invariant, however a dummy variable for foreign director presence (FDir) is not.
My question, how should I specify this model with an interaction term? and how should I interpret the coefficient
Model 1: Firm Performance = FDir*London + Controls
And therefore compare the coefficient to a model without the interaction term London?
or
Model 2: Firm Performance = FDir*London + FDir + Controls
And therefore if Fdir*London is positive and significant conclude that Foreign directors in london firms improve firm performance greater than elsewhere?
Appreciate your guidance,
Reuben
Investigating the influence of Foreign directors on firm performance I am utilising a fixed effects model. Having found an aggregate effect for all directors across all firms around the UK I want to focus on those in London, and see if they improve firm performance at a greater level.
As expected London location is time invariant, however a dummy variable for foreign director presence (FDir) is not.
My question, how should I specify this model with an interaction term? and how should I interpret the coefficient
Model 1: Firm Performance = FDir*London + Controls
And therefore compare the coefficient to a model without the interaction term London?
or
Model 2: Firm Performance = FDir*London + FDir + Controls
And therefore if Fdir*London is positive and significant conclude that Foreign directors in london firms improve firm performance greater than elsewhere?
Appreciate your guidance,
Reuben
Comment