Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comparing fixed effects coefficients between four groups

    Hi,
    I am running fixed effects models across four subsamples. The subsamples are four different countries. My independent variable measures food security (1. High food secure, 2. Moderately food secure, 3. Low food secure). I would like to test which coefficients are statistically different across models. I’ve run the following model:


    Code:
     xtreg WB i.foodcat2##i.country, fe
    note: 504.country omitted because of collinearity
    note: 788.country omitted because of collinearity
    note: 818.country omitted because of collinearity
    
    Fixed-effects (within) regression               Number of obs     =     16,511
    Group variable: Findid                          Number of groups  =      6,454
    
    R-sq:                                           Obs per group:
         within  = 0.0160                                         min =          2
         between = 0.0600                                         avg =        2.6
         overall = 0.0423                                         max =          4
    
                                                    F(8,10049)        =      20.46
    corr(u_i, Xb)  = 0.0717                         Prob > F          =     0.0000
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  WB |      Coef.   Std. Err.      t    P>|t|     [95% Conf. Interval]
    -----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
            foodcat2 |
                Mod  |    .442859   .1088893     4.07   0.000     .2294143    .6563038
                Low  |   .5037213   .1274802     3.95   0.000     .2538347     .753608
                     |
             country |
            Morocco  |          0  (omitted)
            Tunisia  |          0  (omitted)
              Egypt  |          0  (omitted)
                     |
    foodcat2#country |
        Mod#Morocco  |   .1495675   .1284013     1.16   0.244    -.1021248    .4012599
        Mod#Tunisia  |   -.276361    .132398    -2.09   0.037    -.5358876   -.0168345
          Mod#Egypt  |  -.2140328   .1665799    -1.28   0.199    -.5405628    .1124972
        Low#Morocco  |   .3593088   .1499573     2.40   0.017     .0653625     .653255
        Low#Tunisia  |  -.1939231   .1521641    -1.27   0.203    -.4921952     .104349
          Low#Egypt  |  -.1114142    .194939    -0.57   0.568    -.4935336    .2707051
                     |
               _cons |  -.3294008   .0363028    -9.07   0.000    -.4005615   -.2582401
    -----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
             sigma_u |  1.2589113
             sigma_e |  1.3446639
                 rho |  .46709923   (fraction of variance due to u_i)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    F test that all u_i=0: F(6453, 10049) = 2.06                 Prob > F = 0.0000
    
    . testparm i.foodcat2##i.country
    
     ( 1)  1.foodcat2 = 0
     ( 2)  2.foodcat2 = 0
     ( 3)  1.foodcat2#504.country = 0
     ( 4)  1.foodcat2#788.country = 0
     ( 5)  1.foodcat2#818.country = 0
     ( 6)  2.foodcat2#504.country = 0
     ( 7)  2.foodcat2#788.country = 0
     ( 8)  2.foodcat2#818.country = 0
    
           F(  8, 10049) =   20.46
                Prob > F =    0.0000
    I think these results mean that we reject the null that the coefficients for all foodcat and country combinations are jointly equal to zero. But I do not think these answer the question of whether (and which country/s) the coefficient of foodcat2 differ across my models (i.e. which ones are statistically significant and which are not).

    (I know my within R sq is low, but I am just concerned with testing significance of coefficients across models).

  • #2
    Isaac:
    see -lincom-, being aware that the -fe- estimator wipes out time-invariant predictors.
    Kind regards,
    Carlo
    (StataNow 18.5)

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you for brining my attention to lincom Carlo. Yes I have indeed only included time varying indepvars in my fe regressions.

      Comment

      Working...
      X