Hello,
I am working on an event study to analyse acquisition performance of serial acquirers.
I am analysing M&A activity between 1990 and 2011 in US market. In my dataset, each row equals an acquisition observation. For each acquisition observation, I have return (CAR) and calendar information, and around other 20-30 variables specific to the acquirer, target and transaction, including the respective firms' identifiers. As I am interested in studying acquisition activity of most aggressive acquirers, I limited my research to deals announced by only serial acquirers and created a subsample containing the most extreme serial acquirers (called frequent acquirers) (dummy: frequent)
I defined serial acquirers those firms that announced >1 acquisitions in any 3-year event window, between 1990 and 2011 and frequent acquirers those who announced >4, consistently with previous literature. I used -asrol- for this issue. Deals completed by firms not belonging to these two categories were dropped.
Therefore, in my full sample, every acquirer is (at least) a serial acquirer (i.e. it exhibits at least one 3-year event window in which it completed at least 2 acquisitions) but only some are also frequent acquirers.
In the 21-year period, serial acquirers may exhibit just one 3-year event window of serial acquisitions or they could exhibit multiple ones, depending on the number and proximity of deals they announced.
Problem: first, using deal announcement dates, I need to (1) find the most recent 3year event window of serial acquisitions for every acquirer (i.e. the most recent 3-year event window in which the acquirer concluded at least two deals) and then (2) I need to sort acquirers in quintiles based on their average acquisition performance (average car) in their most recent 3-year event window. Eventually, I need to repeat the same procedure for the subsample of frequent acquirers.
Please notice that frequent acquirers need to be ranked according to two different rankings as they are both "simple" serial acquirers (thus to be ranked with the rest of the full sample) and frequent acquirers.
Below a snippet of my dataset. Data are sorted by acquirer (ncusip) and acquisition announcement date (DateAnnounced).
Many thanks for your help.
I am working on an event study to analyse acquisition performance of serial acquirers.
I am analysing M&A activity between 1990 and 2011 in US market. In my dataset, each row equals an acquisition observation. For each acquisition observation, I have return (CAR) and calendar information, and around other 20-30 variables specific to the acquirer, target and transaction, including the respective firms' identifiers. As I am interested in studying acquisition activity of most aggressive acquirers, I limited my research to deals announced by only serial acquirers and created a subsample containing the most extreme serial acquirers (called frequent acquirers) (dummy: frequent)
I defined serial acquirers those firms that announced >1 acquisitions in any 3-year event window, between 1990 and 2011 and frequent acquirers those who announced >4, consistently with previous literature. I used -asrol- for this issue. Deals completed by firms not belonging to these two categories were dropped.
Therefore, in my full sample, every acquirer is (at least) a serial acquirer (i.e. it exhibits at least one 3-year event window in which it completed at least 2 acquisitions) but only some are also frequent acquirers.
In the 21-year period, serial acquirers may exhibit just one 3-year event window of serial acquisitions or they could exhibit multiple ones, depending on the number and proximity of deals they announced.
Problem: first, using deal announcement dates, I need to (1) find the most recent 3year event window of serial acquisitions for every acquirer (i.e. the most recent 3-year event window in which the acquirer concluded at least two deals) and then (2) I need to sort acquirers in quintiles based on their average acquisition performance (average car) in their most recent 3-year event window. Eventually, I need to repeat the same procedure for the subsample of frequent acquirers.
Please notice that frequent acquirers need to be ranked according to two different rankings as they are both "simple" serial acquirers (thus to be ranked with the rest of the full sample) and frequent acquirers.
Below a snippet of my dataset. Data are sorted by acquirer (ncusip) and acquisition announcement date (DateAnnounced).
Many thanks for your help.
Code:
* Example generated by -dataex-. For more info, type help dataex clear input str6 ncusip int DateAnnounced float(frequent car) "000752" 12876 . .08924098 "000752" 13818 . .06256314 "000752" 14140 . .302151 "00077R" 13132 1 .12526032 "00077R" 13185 1 -.00016230275 "00077R" 14003 1 -.11267864 "00077R" 14122 1 .1143486 "00077R" 14174 1 .034760732 "000872" 12354 . .2367528 "000872" 12425 . -.06231568 "000872" 12486 . -.1448541 "00087B" 13543 . .15679727 "00087B" 13653 . -.031344533 "000886" 11042 . -.007266809 "000886" 11141 . .04205509 "000886" 11421 . -.018000174 "000886" 13181 . -.017275183 "000886" 13247 . .1245339 "000886" 14389 . .07862046 "000886" 14663 . .010172108 "000886" 14873 . -.09046644 "000886" 15011 . -.070110634 "000886" 16155 . .0383034 "000886" 16638 . .01705847 "000886" 17461 . -.00518387 "00089C" 13810 . -.1577245 "00089C" 13955 . -.072992705 "000955" 15256 . -.11440317 end format %td DateAnnounced
Comment