I use Stata 16. I am running cmxtmixlogit
SAV, and IR-AV are types of driverless cars.
I got the following results but I need to be sure that my interpretation for the results are right or not? What more can I add?
SAV, and IR-AV are types of driverless cars.
I got the following results but I need to be sure that my interpretation for the results are right or not? What more can I add?
- 1-Reading activity on board shows a positive value, which leads to the probability of selecting a transport mode with a reading possibility to be 1.31 larger than the probability of doing nothing (i.e., the relative risk ratio). Is this correct?
- 2-For the regular transport mode variable, in case of SAV.
- The findings show that respondents tend to use SAV over their current transport modes.
- The utility of being in SAV increases by 0.509 if switching from the car as a driver to the car as a passenger. Is it correct to write utility? what is the correct word? Or the relative risk ratio switching from car as a driver to car as a passenger for being in SAV is 1.66.
- It is demonstrated that SAV is preferred by car as a passenger, walking, and PT users over the car as a driver based on the observed variable transport mode.
- The least probability to use SAV is for drivers (i.e., car as a driver) because all other transport modes show positive values. Is this correct?
- 3- What about the reference alternative? how can I draw conclusions?
- How can I know of people prefer IR-AV over other or not?
