Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fixed Effects High Prob F and low Rsq

    Hello everyone,
    After performing xtoverid and interpreting its results, I decided to run a fe robust regression for my panel data, clustered by countries (36 years and 35 countries). Unfortunately, my model has a very low R sq and Prob > F = 0.2397.
    What are the implications of this? Does this mean I have to find another model? I must mention I do not have a background in statistics or econometrics.

    Below my results. The variables are logged.

    Thank you very much!


    xtreg log_Defence log_RILE log_GDP log_Debt log_Unemployment log_population, fe robust

    Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 774
    Group variable: Id_country Number of groups = 35

    R-sq: Obs per group:
    within = 0.0546 min = 7
    between = 0.0353 avg = 22.1
    overall = 0.0088 max = 37

    F(5,34) = 1.43
    corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.0092 Prob > F = 0.2397

    (Std. Err. adjusted for 35 clusters in Id_country)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Robust
    log_Defence | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
    -----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
    log_RILE | -.0647812 .1569548 -0.41 0.682 -.3837518 .2541894
    log_GDP | .0354831 .3646179 0.10 0.923 -.7055097 .7764758
    log_Debt | .1246861 .1892613 0.66 0.514 -.2599391 .5093114
    log_Unemployment | -.2551505 .2147641 -1.19 0.243 -.6916037 .1813028
    log_population | 8.941947 4.018865 2.22 0.033 .7746302 17.10926
    _cons | -34.12163 17.495 -1.95 0.059 -69.67575 1.432499
    -----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
    sigma_u | 3.1562238
    sigma_e | .71949173
    rho | .95060142 (fraction of variance due to u_i)



  • #2
    Silvina:
    welcome to this forum.
    1) as you invoked the community-contributed module -xtoverid- (as FAQ recommend to mention) your standard errors were, in all likelihood, already clustered;
    2) as per the negligible within R-sq, your data seems to have a minimal within panel variation. Is this is the case, -fe- will not take you that far;
    3) your T dimension is large enough to recommend taking a look at -xtgls- and -xtregar-;
    4) check whether your model is correcly specified.
    Kind regards,
    Carlo
    (StataNow 18.5)

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you, Carlo! Correct, I did cluster my standard errors before invoking xtoverid. I will have a look at -xtgls- and -xtregar and check whether my model is misspecified. I have read several other posts and the discussions in this forum have helped me a lot. Really appreciate it.

      Best regards,
      Silvina




      Comment

      Working...
      X