You are not logged in. You can browse but not post. Login or Register by clicking 'Login or Register' at the top-right of this page. For more information on Statalist, see the FAQ.
you mean linear in the regressors you are using i guess. Well, in my view it is difficult to answer your question. You have many observations in your dataset. Nonetheless, i would not make a decision about linearity/not linearit, based on tma graph. First i would check the relevant literature to see if it offers any suggestion. Eventually, if not linearity can be justified on a theoretical ground, then i would check if your data fits within a not linear framework. There are some specific tests that you can run, for instance utest (ssc install utest) to check for a quadratic U shape or inverse U shape relationship.
Looking at a graph can provide a first preliminary intuition but not a final word about the specification you should use
Pedro:
as an aside to Dario's helpful advice, I would add:
1) interested listers cannot be sure of what you've plotted on your graph. Is it fitted values against a given predictor?
2) have you searched for possible turning points in your regression equation?
3) have you tested that the functional form of the regressand is correctly specified (see -linktest-)?
4) have you tested for heteroskedastcity in the residual distribution and, in case you detected it, have you considered transforming the regressand or imposing -robust- standard errors?
Comment