Dear Zylkin and Silva,
Thank you very much for responding to the previous questions.
I am estimating the PPML gravity model, using bilateral trade values in the services sector (cross-section data) as a dependant variable, and country-specific fixed effects as regressors. Other regressors include distance, contiguity, common colony, and importer's GDP constrained to 0.8.
The distance, common colony, and contiguity, all are negative and significant. If I skip the contiguity and common colony, that does not affect R and distance is still negative.
My question is:
1. How do you interpret that contiguity and common colony reduce trade in services?
2. Do you advise me to run the regression excluding common colony and contiguity? I have a problem in explaining the theory behind the negative co-efficient of contiguity and common colony.
Thank you.
NOTE: ppmlhdfe did not work in my case,
Thank you very much for responding to the previous questions.
I am estimating the PPML gravity model, using bilateral trade values in the services sector (cross-section data) as a dependant variable, and country-specific fixed effects as regressors. Other regressors include distance, contiguity, common colony, and importer's GDP constrained to 0.8.
The distance, common colony, and contiguity, all are negative and significant. If I skip the contiguity and common colony, that does not affect R and distance is still negative.
My question is:
1. How do you interpret that contiguity and common colony reduce trade in services?
2. Do you advise me to run the regression excluding common colony and contiguity? I have a problem in explaining the theory behind the negative co-efficient of contiguity and common colony.
Thank you.
NOTE: ppmlhdfe did not work in my case,
Comment