Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • collecting accurate confidence intervals for binomial proportion estimate from cross-sectional cluster survey

    Hi there,

    I have been working mainly with multiple cross-sectional surveys that are multi-stage cluster sampling. I have been trying to figure out the best way to calculate the means along with the confidence intervals. The method I have been using has been: 'proportion exbf, vce(cluster clusternumber)' where exbf = variable of analysis and clusternumber = primary sampling unit variable. Would this provide me the correct results? It's giving me the 95% Logit CI and not sure if this is what I'm needing.

    Thanks in advance,
    -Brett

  • #2
    No, that's not quite right. First, -svyset- your data set. Then use the -svy: proportion- command.

    -help svyset-
    -help svy_estimation- and follow the link for -proportion-.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Clyde,

      Okay that's great. Thanks very much for your insight. I will try this out.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi there,

        So I managed to work out the svyset and svy for proportions. This is what I came up with:


        svyset

        pweight: <none>
        VCE: linearized
        Single unit: missing
        Strata 1: <one>
        SU 1: clusternumber
        FPC 1: <zero>


        Where 'clusternumber' is cluster variable.

        An example around bottle feeding use:

        . svy:proportion bottle
        (running proportion on estimation sample)

        Survey: Proportion estimation

        Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1,598
        Number of PSUs = 43 Population size = 1,598
        Design df = 42

        --------------------------------------------------------------
        | Linearized Logit
        | Proportion Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval]
        -------------+------------------------------------------------
        bottle |
        0 | .7916145 .0206998 .7467682 .8303233
        1 | .2083855 .0206998 .1696767 .2532318
        --------------------------------------------------------------

        So this should have the clusters as the primary sampling unit and calculate the CI taking into consideration the clustered sampling method. Is this more accurate/correct? Or am I still missing something?

        Cheers,
        -Brett

        Comment


        • #5
          Assuming that your -svyset- parameters accurately reflect the sampling design of the survey, yes, this should give you appropriate estimates and confidence intervals.

          Comment


          • #6
            Great thanks for your help again Clyde.

            Cheers,
            -Brett

            Comment

            Working...
            X