Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by JanDitzen View Post
    Hi Eyup TANIL,
    there is - to the best of my knowledge - no guidance on the lag length of ARDL models in panel data models with cross-sectional dependence. My advice would be to determine the lag structure for each country individually and then compare results with different lag lengths.

    Given the size of N, I would strongly advice against the use of xtdcce2, respectively the CCE estimator. The estimator and the concept of strong cross-sectional dependence are only valid if N and T are large. N=4 is certainly not large!

    I do not know the Youtube videos or people who record them. In general, if you estimate an ECM model, you should take the first difference of the variables.

    Hope this helps.
    Dear Mr. Ditzen,

    I have made updates to my dataset, and currently I have N:15 T:46 panel data. I have 4 variables;1 dependent and 3 independent variables. Among these variables, the dependent variable and 2 independent variables are integrated of order 1 (I(1)), and one variable is integrated of order 0 (I(0)). There is cross-sectional dependence.

    When modeling these variables using the (CS-ARDL) xtdcce2 command, I am wondering whether to use the differences or the raw data. What are the differences or advantages between these two methods?

    Additionally, you mentioned "My advice would be to determine the lag structure for each country individually and then compare results with different lag lengths." How can I perform this process ?

    I run a model as like below; ı run CS-ARDL (1 0 0 0) with difference of all variables. results coeffient good for the model. but what does mean CD-istatistics and prob> F. is this model biased and have problem.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Eyup TANIL View Post
      I have made updates to my dataset, and currently I have N:15 T:46 panel data. I have 4 variables;1 dependent and 5 independent variables. Among these variables, the dependent variable and 2 independent variables are integrated of order 1 (I(1)), and one variable is integrated of order 0 (I(0)). There is cross-sectional dependence.
      N = 15 is much better, but it is still on the lower end. I would be very careful drawing conclusions regarding cross-sectional dependence and mean group coefficients. The small N will bias results.

      Originally posted by Eyup TANIL View Post
      When modeling these variables using the (CS-ARDL) xtdcce2 command, I am wondering whether to use the differences or the raw data. What are the differences or advantages between these two methods?
      In a nutshell, the ECM assumes a equilibrium with short term deviations from it. This allows the data to be integrated and the short term deviations are the first differences. The advantage of the ARDL model is that it does not require this assumption.

      Originally posted by Eyup TANIL View Post
      Additionally, you mentioned "My advice would be to determine the lag structure for each country individually and then compare results with different lag lengths." How can I perform this process ?
      I was thinking about a simple time series model. You select the lag length for each country, which is essentially a time series.

      Originally posted by Eyup TANIL View Post
      I run a model as like below; ı run CS-ARDL (1 0 0 0) with difference of all variables. results coeffient good for the model. but what does mean CD-istatistics and prob> F. is this model biased and have problem.
      The CD test tells you that the null hypothesis of weak cross-sectional dependence is not rejected. The alternative is strong dependence. The F-test is the standard F test for joint significance.

      Comment


      • #18
        So, according to the F-test results, my results are insignificant. Am I concluding that the model I have created is producing meaningless results?

        Comment


        • #19
          JanDitzen can we select cr_lags(0)? ıf we found cd-statisctic p value above 0,10 . here is the my results . ıf ı take cr_lags(0) cd statistic p value and F statistic good for model.

          xtdcce2 d.ef, lr(L(1/3)d.ef L(0/2).d.fdi L(0/2).d.gdper L(0/2).d.gdper2 ) lr_options(ardl) cr(d.ef d.fdi d.gdper d.gdper2) cr_lags(0) fullsample
          (Dynamic) Common Correlated Effects Estimator - (CS-ARDL)

          Panel Variable (i): id Number of obs = 705
          Time Variable (t): year Number of groups = 15

          Degrees of freedom per group: Obs per group (T) = 47
          without cross-sectional averages = 34
          with cross-sectional averages = 30
          Number of F(255, 450) = 1.22
          cross-sectional lags = 0 Prob > F = 0.03
          variables in mean group regression = 180 R-squared = 0.59
          variables partialled out = 75 R-squared (MG) = 0.49
          Root MSE = 0.29
          CD Statistic = -1.37
          p-value = 0.1700
          -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          D.ef| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
          ---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
          Short Run Est.|
          ---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
          Mean Group: |
          LD.ef| -.2239098 .0471513 -4.75 0.000 -.3163246 -.1314949
          L2D.ef| -.0793347 .0372199 -2.13 0.033 -.1522843 -.0063851
          L3D.ef| -.0936635 .0333912 -2.81 0.005 -.1591092 -.0282179
          D.fdi| -.0148872 .0087699 -1.70 0.090 -.0320759 .0023015
          D.gdper| .0002672 .0001431 1.87 0.062 -.0000133 .0005477
          D.gdper2| -2.50e-09 2.03e-09 -1.23 0.218 -6.47e-09 1.47e-09
          LD.fdi| -.0156117 .0113154 -1.38 0.168 -.0377896 .0065661
          L2D.fdi| -.0275879 .0139804 -1.97 0.048 -.054989 -.0001868
          LD.gdper| -.0000142 .0001173 -0.12 0.904 -.0002442 .0002158
          L2D.gdper| .0000767 .0001004 0.76 0.445 -.0001201 .0002735
          LD.gdper2| 1.52e-09 1.61e-09 0.95 0.344 -1.63e-09 4.68e-09
          L2D.gdper2| -8.08e-10 1.98e-09 -0.41 0.684 -4.69e-09 3.08e-09
          ---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
          Adjust. Term |
          ---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
          Mean Group: |
          lr_ef| -1.396908 .0792967 -17.62 0.000 -1.552327 -1.241489
          ---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
          Long Run Est. |
          ---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
          Mean Group: |
          lr_fdi| -.0373162 .018993 -1.96 0.049 -.0745418 -.0000906
          lr_gdper| .0002351 .0000953 2.47 0.014 .0000483 .0004218
          lr_gdper2| -1.55e-09 1.81e-09 -0.86 0.392 -5.10e-09 2.00e-09
          -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Mean Group Variables: LD.ef L2D.ef L3D.ef D.fdi D.gdper D.gdper2 LD.fdi L2D.fdi LD.gdper L2D.gdper LD.gdper2 L2D.gdper2 lr_fdi lr_gdper lr_gdper2
          Cross Sectional Averaged Variables: D.ef D.fdi D.gdper D.gdper2
          Long Run Variables: lr_fdi lr_gdper lr_gdper2
          Adjustment variable(s): lr_ef (LD.ef L2D.ef L3D.ef)
          Heterogenous constant partialled out.

          But I select cr_lags(3) as pesaran said. ( my data set T:51 [T^(1/3)]=3,66 ). is my model prob>F 1.00 is not good, and then CD sitatistic p value 0.03 ; What can I do this stiuation ?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	Adsız.png
Views:	1
Size:	64.3 KB
ID:	1717901



          And my last questions , how can ı see aic information critera for CS_ARDL results?
          Last edited by Eyup TANIL; 21 Jun 2023, 04:11.

          Comment


          • #20
            You can use cr_lags(0), though following theory you should add lags. I would compare how the CD test statistic and the coefficients change if you add further lags.

            I would also investigate why some of the coefficients are very small. Is this because the individual coefficients are equally small or is it because the individual coefficients are distributed around essentially zero.

            Comment


            • #21
              Firstly , thank JanDitzen for feedback, How can ı determine my varieblas lag lenth? can we compare aic infermation critera for lag selection. but ı dont know how to calculate aic info cretirea in CS-ARLD model? are you have any code for that?


              I understand from your response that Ican select "cr_lag(0)" and if the probability value of the CD statistic is greater than 0.10 and F is less than 0.10, then I can use this model for my article. Am I understanding correctly?

              Comment


              • #22
                To the best of my knowledge there are no lag selection criteria for such a setting. One can of course use AIC/BIC, but I am unsure if they are valid in the presence of cross-section dependence.

                Regarding your second question: yes, but I would present results with higher order lags as well.

                Comment

                Working...
                X