Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interpreting probit marginal effects

    I have a question about how to interpret the marginal effects in a probit model that I hope someone can help me with. Take a model that looks at school dropout (dependent variable =1 if dropped out, 0 otherwise) and household asset loss (independent variable ranging from 0 to 1, indicating the proportion of assets lost in the past year due to earthquake).

    Code:
     . probit dropout assetloss
    
    dropout       Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>z     [95% Conf.    Interval]
            
    assetloss     .491884   .0888692     5.53    0.000     .3177036    .6660644
    _cons   -1.493199   .0399956   -37.33    0.000    -1.571589    -1.414809
    Code:
    margins, dydx(assetloss) predict(pr) post 
    
    Average marginal effects    Number of obs     =    2,879
    Model VCE    : OIM
    
    Expression   : Pr(enrolled), predict(pr)
    dy/dx w.r.t. : assetloss
    
            
    Delta-method
    dy/dx   Std. Err.      z    P>z     [95% Conf.    Interval]      
    assetloss    .0736991   .0134485     5.48    0.000     .0473406    .1000576
    Is it correct to interpret the marginal effects as follows: As asset losses increased by 100 per cent, the average marginal effect on the probability of dropping out of school increased by 0.073 percentage points?

  • #2
    It is not the average marginal effect on the probability of dropping out of school that increased but it is the probability of dropping out of school that (on average) increased. Moreover, it did not increase by 0.074 percentage points, but by 7.3 percentage points; a probability is a number between 0 and 1, and you can turn it into percentages by multiplying it by a 100.
    ---------------------------------
    Maarten L. Buis
    University of Konstanz
    Department of history and sociology
    box 40
    78457 Konstanz
    Germany
    http://www.maartenbuis.nl
    ---------------------------------

    Comment


    • #3
      Many thanks Maarten.

      Comment


      • #4
        Marginal effects for continuous variables can be difficult to interpret or can be misinterpreted. See

        https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc73994/Margins02.pdf

        Excerpt: "MEMs for continuous variables measure the instantaneous rate of change, which may or may not be close to the effect on P(Y=1) of a one unit increase in Xk."

        Personally, with continuous independent variables, I like to use Royston's MCP command, available from SSC:

        https://www.stata-journal.com/articl...article=gr0056

        I summarize some highlights of the command at

        https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc73994/Margins03.pdf
        -------------------------------------------
        Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
        StataNow Version: 19.5 MP (2 processor)

        EMAIL: [email protected]
        WWW: https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam

        Comment

        Working...
        X