Hello,
I have an unbalanced panel data set with N = 185 and T = 5. I have 8 dependent variables of which two do not change over time. Therefore, I think random effects is the one to use to tackle this problem. However, I am still struggling a lot at what command to use. I have been asking questions and have been strolling down the internet a lot, and many times it has been pointed out that for T < N xtreg, re is the way to go. However, I do not find an explanation of why this is the case. I have read the part of xtgee In the pdf manual, and here they state the following:" xtgee, fam(gauss) link(ident) corr(exch) is asymptotically equivalent to the weighted-GLS estimator provided by xtreg, re". However, when I run both models, both are very dissimilar. I have significant regressors for the xtgee, but not for the xtreg, re command.
Could somebody please clarify this for me, as I want to understand what I am doing.
Thank you very much,
Timea De Wispelaere
I have an unbalanced panel data set with N = 185 and T = 5. I have 8 dependent variables of which two do not change over time. Therefore, I think random effects is the one to use to tackle this problem. However, I am still struggling a lot at what command to use. I have been asking questions and have been strolling down the internet a lot, and many times it has been pointed out that for T < N xtreg, re is the way to go. However, I do not find an explanation of why this is the case. I have read the part of xtgee In the pdf manual, and here they state the following:" xtgee, fam(gauss) link(ident) corr(exch) is asymptotically equivalent to the weighted-GLS estimator provided by xtreg, re". However, when I run both models, both are very dissimilar. I have significant regressors for the xtgee, but not for the xtreg, re command.
Could somebody please clarify this for me, as I want to understand what I am doing.
Thank you very much,
Timea De Wispelaere
Comment