Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PPML estimation

    Joao Santos Silva
    Dear Joao Santos Silva
    I am very new to gravity model , your kind suggestion on the model and results would help me a lot

    ppml Xijt gi gj logpij lognij exchange linder3 Cost RTA contig lang Landlocked

    note: checking the existence of the estimates
    WARNING: Xijt has very large values, consider rescaling
    WARNING: gi has very large values, consider rescaling or recentering
    WARNING: gj has very large values, consider rescaling or recentering
    WARNING: exchange has very large values, consider rescaling or recentering
    WARNING: Cost has very large values, consider rescaling or recentering
    note: starting ppml estimation
    note: Xijt has noninteger values

    Iteration 1: deviance = 3.93e+09
    Iteration 2: deviance = 3.12e+09
    Iteration 3: deviance = 3.03e+09
    Iteration 4: deviance = 3.00e+09
    Iteration 5: deviance = 2.91e+09
    Iteration 6: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 7: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 8: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 9: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 10: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 11: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 12: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 13: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 14: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 15: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 16: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 17: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 18: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 19: deviance = 2.86e+09
    Iteration 20: deviance = 2.86e+09

    Number of parameters: 12
    Number of observations: 3922
    Number of observations dropped: 0
    Pseudo log-likelihood: -1.449e+09
    R-squared: .58449951
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Robust
    Xijt | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
    -------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
    gi | .0452378 .0037543 12.05 0.000 .0378794 .0525962
    gj | -.0087716 .0037564 -2.34 0.020 -.016134 -.0014093
    logpij | -.7586275 .1582948 -4.79 0.000 -1.06888 -.4483754
    lognij | 1.95404 .13085 14.93 0.000 1.697579 2.210502
    exchange | .0006345 .0004417 1.44 0.151 -.0002312 .0015003
    linder3 | -.2784518 .1139317 -2.44 0.015 -.5017539 -.0551497
    Cost | -.4860289 .1373231 -3.54 0.000 -.7551772 -.2168805
    RTA | .5449323 .0897372 6.07 0.000 .3690506 .7208139
    contig | .6506576 .1505984 4.32 0.000 .3554902 .945825
    lang | .1742402 .0724501 2.40 0.016 .0322406 .3162399
    Landlocked | -.6947127 .1333741 -5.21 0.000 -.9561212 -.4333043
    _cons | -2.561144 .5722439 -4.48 0.000 -3.682722 -1.439567
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Number of regressors dropped to ensure that the estimates exist: 0
    Option strict is off

  • #2
    Dear Statalisters, kindly share your opinion

    Comment


    • #3
      Dear Shikha Gupta,

      To get any meaningful responses, you need to explain what you want to do and ask specific questions.

      Best wishes,

      Joao

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear Joao Santos Silva sir and Statalisters
        I am trying to arrest the impact of globalisation on exports.
        Exports are my dependent variable and I have not taken it in log form.
        The variables - Globalisation Index, Exchange rate and shipping cost are not in log form
        However, I have taken the product of GDP and Product of population in log form.
        Am I right in my approach?
        secondly, the results say Iteration: deviance, which I am unable to interpret.
        Will be grateful if you can suggest

        Comment


        • #5
          Dear Shikha Gupta,

          I suggest that you start by reading the documentation on the glm command and the references therein.

          Best wishes,

          Joao

          Comment


          • #6
            Dear Joao Santos Silva sir,
            Thank you for your recommendation.
            Shall look at it and get back
            Regards
            Shikha Gupta

            Comment

            Working...
            X