Dear Statalisters,
I am analysing longitudinal data in long format from a complex survey design.
Those in charge the data distribution suggest to handle them in this way:
svyset psu [pweight=weightres4], strata ( strata ) singleunit(centered) (1)
Weights are time-varying so, they vary for individuals and waves.
So far, I ran a model of this type
svy: logit y x
but I wish I could use a random effect model to control for individual unobserved heterogeneity.
xtlogit is not supported by svy.
So I was wondering whether melogit could be used and in that case
how to set model such that it considers the complex design in (1).
In the end I think that the hierarchy of the levels should be:
_n (t) <-- ID <--strata<-- psu
.
and the model this one:
melogit y x [pweight=weightres4] ||pidnew: || strata: || psu:, or level(95)
But I would like to have an opinion on whether this specification is correct,
as computing this model and the margins from this model is quite long
and I am not sure whether this specification is correct.
Thank you and best,
Lydia
I am analysing longitudinal data in long format from a complex survey design.
Those in charge the data distribution suggest to handle them in this way:
svyset psu [pweight=weightres4], strata ( strata ) singleunit(centered) (1)
Weights are time-varying so, they vary for individuals and waves.
So far, I ran a model of this type
svy: logit y x
but I wish I could use a random effect model to control for individual unobserved heterogeneity.
xtlogit is not supported by svy.
So I was wondering whether melogit could be used and in that case
how to set model such that it considers the complex design in (1).
In the end I think that the hierarchy of the levels should be:
_n (t) <-- ID <--strata<-- psu
.
and the model this one:
melogit y x [pweight=weightres4] ||pidnew: || strata: || psu:, or level(95)
But I would like to have an opinion on whether this specification is correct,
as computing this model and the margins from this model is quite long
and I am not sure whether this specification is correct.
Thank you and best,
Lydia
Comment