Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Dear Guest,

    The interpretation is as in a linear model with a dependent variable in logs: for regressors in logs the coefficient is an elasticity (measured in %) for regressors not logged, the coefficient is approximately a semi-elasticity (in p.p.).

    Best wishes,

    Joao
    Last edited by sladmin; 03 Dec 2024, 16:15. Reason: anonymize original poster

    Comment


    • #77
      following

      Comment


      • #78
        Guest, is it advisable to use log variable of GDP and DIST when using ppmlhdfe command. Joao Santos Silva
        Last edited by sladmin; 03 Dec 2024, 16:15. Reason: anonymize original poster

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Joao Santos Silva View Post
          Dear Guest,

          The interpretation is as in a linear model with a dependent variable in logs: for regressors in logs the coefficient is an elasticity (measured in %) for regressors not logged, the coefficient is approximately a semi-elasticity (in p.p.).

          Best wishes,

          Joao
          Professor, regarding not logged coefficient for NTM (non-tariff measures), NTMt = NTMt + NTM t-1 (applied in cummulative) the coefficient is - 0.0128. In this regard, since it is the semi-elasticity can I applied (100*(exp(beta)-1)) formula for interpretation. Second NTM as in restrictiveness (frequency index (%) ) which is not logged as well. The coefficient in this analysis is - 0.0063. Can I apply the previous formula to interpret this outcome too?
          Thanks again for your time and consideration.
          Last edited by sladmin; 03 Dec 2024, 16:15. Reason: anonymize original poster

          Comment


          • #80
            sybil arqi
            Please visit this forum, "Problem with generating country pair fixed effects in Gravity estimation". (To answer your question, "Yes") Professor Santos Silva please correct me if I am mistaken it.

            Comment


            • #81
              Joao Santos Silva kindly clarify whether to generate log DIST and log GDP while using ppmlhdfe.....or to use them in their original form?

              Comment


              • #82
                Dear sybil arqi,

                GDP and distance should indeed be logged.

                Best wishes,

                Joao

                Comment


                • #83
                  Dear Guest,

                  That is correct, but with estimates so close to zero the transformation will have little effect and the result will be almost identical to the estimate itself.

                  Best wishes,

                  Joao
                  Last edited by sladmin; 03 Dec 2024, 16:15. Reason: anonymize original poster

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Professor, thank you very much.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Joao Santos Silva fine. i have imports and exports as dependent variable and rta, common language, contiguity, common colony , population, GDP as independent variables. may you please tell me which one log and which ones to not log as i am using ppmlhdfe command. thanks

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Dear sybil arqi

                        Log all the explanatory variables that are not dummies. Do not log the dependent variable.

                        Best wishes,

                        Joao
                        Last edited by Joao Santos Silva; 25 Jul 2023, 08:35.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Dear Joao Santos Silva .
                          My regressor is an index (contineous variable) that lies between 0 to 5 and i am taking its logarithm. Suppose, I am estimating an exponential mean model y=exp(X)nij,t using PPML, where y is trade flows (levels) and X is a vector of covariates. My coefficient on logarithm of index is 1.25. Can i interpret it as, 1% increase in index leads to almost 1.25 % increase in trade flows.

                          Thanks,
                          (Ridwan)

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Dear Ridwan Sheikh

                            Assuming the index has no zeros and has cardinal meaning (i.e., 4 is 2 times 2, not just larger than 2), then that is correct.

                            Best wishes,

                            Joao

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Thanks Joao Santos Silva , this was really helpful.
                              It is possible to have an index value of Zero, If that be a case, then we should avoid log-transformation and use the regressor (said index) in levels and interpret the coefficient as semi-elasticity. Is that what you mean?
                              Thanks,
                              (Ridwan)

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Dear Ridwan Sheikh,

                                Yes, if you have zeros you cannot take logs.

                                Best wishes,

                                Joao

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X