Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes

    Hello all,

    I hope someone can point me to resources (within or beyond the Statasphere) relevant to the following. I am interested in the effect of a treatment T on two outcomes, Y and Z. Thus,

    Code:
    Y =   aX + bT + cXT + u
    Z =   dX + fT + gXT + v
    
    T = 1(hX + kZ + e > 0), estimated by logit or probit.
    I am not willing to assume that corr(e, u) = corr(e, v) = 0. The issue of whether corr(u, v) = 0 or not is a headache for another day at this point.

    To make this concrete, let Y be income, Z be training opportunities taken and T be union membership. Let everything be continuous and normally distributed for simplicity.

    I'm stuck on how to estimate the treatment effect for union membership here. Beyond the question of which command to use, my conceptual hangup is that a person only gets to choose one union status, but that choice is potentially correlated with both income and training opportunities given (non)-membership in a union. Because of that, modeling the two outcomes separately seems problematic.

    I'm more comfortable (perhaps wrongly) with how I'd handle this if I could assume conditional independence. I think that I could apply any of the teffects commands to Y and Z separately.

    Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Thank you.

    Glenn
    _______________________________________

    Glenn Hoetker
    Professor in Business Strategy

    Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne
    200 Leicester Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
    Email: [email protected]

    I acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land on which I work, the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin Nations, and pay my respects to their Elders, past and present.

  • #2
    You didn't get a quick answer so let me offer my 2 cents worth.

    I would think you would be fine if you include T and XT in the selection equation. Then the treatment controls for the potential influence of those factors on the treatment which is what you're worried about. You could then estimate this as two separate heckman estimates which would implicitly let the errors of the two outcome questions correlate. Another way to do this would probably be a selection model in GSEM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you, Phil, for the thoughts. I'll give them a try!
      _______________________________________

      Glenn Hoetker
      Professor in Business Strategy

      Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne
      200 Leicester Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
      Email: [email protected]

      I acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land on which I work, the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin Nations, and pay my respects to their Elders, past and present.

      Comment

      Working...
      X