Hello everyone,
is there a (simple) way to name the log files after the do files without changing the name of the log file after changing the name of the respective do-file? I read about the batch mode, but this is not an option for me because I have to run the do files via a remote job submission application (due to security restriction of the dataset), and therefore I cannot access the installation of Stata.
One possible way I thought of is saving the name of the do file in a local and using this local to create the log file. However, I'm not aware of any command that is able to display the name of the current do file. Is there a command which shows me the name of the do-file?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sebastian
is there a (simple) way to name the log files after the do files without changing the name of the log file after changing the name of the respective do-file? I read about the batch mode, but this is not an option for me because I have to run the do files via a remote job submission application (due to security restriction of the dataset), and therefore I cannot access the installation of Stata.
One possible way I thought of is saving the name of the do file in a local and using this local to create the log file. However, I'm not aware of any command that is able to display the name of the current do file. Is there a command which shows me the name of the do-file?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sebastian
Comment