Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • deseasonalize data

    Hi all,
    Click image for larger version

Name:	deseaonalize data.png
Views:	1
Size:	17.5 KB
ID:	1324043


    As is shown in the above snapshot, the authors claime that the data of variable "OpInc", which is quarterly , "is deseasonalized", and I don't know how.
    any suggestion and advice would be deeply appreciated.
    Last edited by 高佳; 24 Jan 2016, 21:16.

  • #2
    Apparently you are unfamiliar with seasonality in time series data. The Wikipedia article on seasonality is a place to start. Within Stata, the output of search seasonality includes, among other things, a link to a Stata Journal article by Nick Cox (Stata Tip 76: Separating Seasonal Time Series) and a pointer to the variants of the tsfilter command. With regard to the latter, the tsfilter documentation in the Stata Time-Series Reference Manual PDF is much more comprehensive than the terse results in the help files linked to from search.

    Comment


    • #3
      William gives good advice. But note that there many ways to deseasonalize data, and we can't tell you which was used in that paper (unless freakishly someone has read that paper and recognises the output).

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by William Lisowski View Post
        Apparently you are unfamiliar with seasonality in time series data. The Wikipedia article on seasonality is a place to start. Within Stata, the output of search seasonality includes, among other things, a link to a Stata Journal article by Nick Cox (Stata Tip 76: Separating Seasonal Time Series) and a pointer to the variants of the tsfilter command. With regard to the latter, the tsfilter documentation in the Stata Time-Series Reference Manual PDF is much more comprehensive than the terse results in the help files linked to from search.

        Thanks William, I'm really a rookie to STATA and econometric. Your advice do help me a lot!!!

        This really is a great forum!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Nick Cox View Post
          William gives good advice. But note that there many ways to deseasonalize data, and we can't tell you which was used in that paper (unless freakishly someone has read that paper and recognises the output).

          I agree with you Nick,
          have already emailed the author with some other questions like how to deal with the large amount of negative values when make the log transformation before I came here to post, but there still nothing back.

          Comment


          • #6
            Negative logarithms are not a problem. Negative values rule out logarithms as such.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Nick Cox View Post
              Negative logarithms are not a problem. Negative values rule out logarithms as such.

              but can you still take log even if more than half of your data is negative??? or is there some standard ways to process the data to make it suitable for logarithm? I know you can replace 0 as 0.001 or simply plus 1 to 0, but my data has such big absolute value that seem impossible to deal it this way.
              Last edited by 高佳; 25 Jan 2016, 20:12.

              Comment


              • #8
                Many threads here on Statalist and on Cross Validated about this. Google "cube root transformation Stata" and then "neglog transformation"

                Comment

                Working...
                X