My dependent variable takes on a value of 0 or 1.
So i should go ahead and run either probit or logit of which i prefer logit, just because of the interpretation it gives in terms of odds ratio.
I ran both and R^2 is about the same, and the log-likelihood is also about the same.
So my question is, i know probit assumes normality of its error term, and logit assumes logistic distribution of its error term.
Since i cannot observe how my error term is distributed, is it ok to just assume logistic distribution and go ahead with logit model?
Or is there any way to figure out which model is better?
Thanks in advance!
So i should go ahead and run either probit or logit of which i prefer logit, just because of the interpretation it gives in terms of odds ratio.
I ran both and R^2 is about the same, and the log-likelihood is also about the same.
So my question is, i know probit assumes normality of its error term, and logit assumes logistic distribution of its error term.
Since i cannot observe how my error term is distributed, is it ok to just assume logistic distribution and go ahead with logit model?
Or is there any way to figure out which model is better?
Thanks in advance!
Comment