Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • -ppml- now available in SSC

    Dear All,

    Thanks to Kit Baum, a new version of -ppml- is now available in SSC. This version is only slightly different form the original version published almost 5 years ago in the Stata Journal, but users are encouraged to update. Please do let me know if you have problems using the new version.

    Thank you for your interest in -ppml-,

    Joao

  • #2


    Dear Joao Santos Silva
    I am estimating a bilateral gravity model where source countries are 10 in numbers and the host country is only one. I have many zeros in my dependent variable. The time period is 15 years so my dataset is small so can I apply ppml or ppmlhdfe model? I am applying the augmented gravity model, is it fine or should go for any other model?

    I am asking this question as I have read that ppml can be applied in the big dataset with heteroscedasticity.
    please provide some references to study about the ppml and ppmlhdfe model in details.



    Comment


    • #3
      Dear Neha Kanojia,

      Your dataset is really small, but I would still use the PPML estimator, as implemented in ppmlhdfe. However, I would consider expanding your dataset because otherwise the results may not be reliable.

      Best wishes,

      Joao

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear Joao Santos Silva

        Thanks a lot for your response.
        The host country in the study is India and the source countries are ASEAN countries. As I am studying a block, I cannot increase the dataset.
        I have two doubts
        1) If I apply the ppmlhdfe , can I do something to make my estimators reliable?
        2) As per my little knowledge, I think ppml command provides inbuilt robust results. Is ppmlhdfe also give an inbuilt robust result or do we have to use a command to get robust results?

        Comment


        • #5
          Dear Neha Kanojia,

          The results of the two commands should be identical, but ppmlhdfe is faster and is better at dealing with some numerical issues.

          Best wishes,

          Joao

          Comment


          • #6
            Dear Joao Santos Silva,

            Thanks a lot for your prompt response.

            Comment


            • #7
              Dear Joao Santos Silva,

              Can you plz tell me the commands which we have to follow while applying ppmlhdfe ?, I am using this model for the first time. I need your guidance.

              Comment


              • #8
                Please check the help file for the ppmlhdfe command for examples.

                Best wishes,

                Joao

                Comment


                • #9
                  Dear Joao Santos Silva

                  the command which I am getting in the help file is as follows which is giving robust results directly-
                  CASE 1-
                  ppmlhdfe depvar indepvar, absorb( panel id)

                  but I am confused should I apply the above command or
                  CASE 2-

                  apply the Hausman test first

                  xtpossion depvar indevar, fe
                  estimate store
                  xtpossion depvar indepvar, re
                  hausman fe re, sigmamore

                  then on the basis of hausman test apply fixed or random effect robust results.

                  xtpossion depvar inpvar, fe vce(robust)

                  please guide which one is correct?


                  Comment


                  • #10
                    There is no need to use the Hausman test, just use the estimator with fixed effects. In the contxt of non-linear models such as the one estimated by PPML, the random effect estimators are not interesting because they depend on very strong assumptions.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Dear Joao Santos Silva
                      Thanks a lot, I will run the command then I will show you the results.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Dear Joao Santos Silva

                        I have attached the estimated results for ppmlhdfe, can you please check and suggest are they correct?
                        I have checked multicollinearity and directly apply the ppmlhdfe command, can we check the significance level of other time-invariant variables by applying any command?

                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I do not know what you are doing, so I cannot make any detailed comments, but I do not see anything suspicious.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Thanks a lot for your guidance. It is really helpful.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Dear Joao Santos Silva,

                              As discussed with you, I applied ppmlhdfe model to estimate a bilateral gravity model where source countries are 10 in numbers and the host country is only one. I have many zeros in my dependent variable and the time period is 15 years. I have 2 questions:-

                              1)Do I need to apply any test to check the specification of the model like Ramsey reset Test and Manning and Mullahy test before application of ppmlhdfe?
                              2) command applied by me is correct or not?

                              For getting, autocorrelation corrected results

                              ppmlhdfe depvar indepvar, absorb( panelid) vce(robust)

                              OR

                              for getting, autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity corrected results

                              ppmlhdfe depvar indepvar, absorb( panelid) vce(cluster panelid)

                              please guide.


                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X