Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    After matching, common support looks acceptable. The figure shows that the control group has a higher max p score before matching, but not after matching.
    David Radwin
    Senior Researcher, California Competes
    californiacompetes.org
    Pronouns: He/Him

    Comment


    • #32
      Thank you, appreciated; and a special thank you for the syntax to reproduce Richard Hofler's graph after kernel matching. It helped me a lot.

      Comment


      • #33
        I ran the before and after command histogram commands successfully.
        Afterward, I modified the ps graph to add the squares of several covariates.
        I still only have 1 _n1 variable, so the histogram is the same before.
        How can you produce new histograms when you use different covariates?

        Comment


        • #34
          Hi. I wondered if the dummy for matched treatment/control groups was now updated as below,

          Code:
          replace _treat =0 if  _treat ==0 & dup >0
          It was also shown in some posts that,

          Code:
          *After PSM
          
          twoway (kdensity _pscore if _treated==1) (kdensity _pscore if _weight !=1 & _weight !=. , lpattern(dash)), legend( label( 1 "treated") label( 2 "control" ) ) xtitle("propensity score")
          Was the latter also correct? I was confused about the condition, "if _weight !=1 & _weight !=."

          Thank you.

          Comment

          Working...
          X