Hi, I hope you all are having a good day.
I'm working on a probit model, and I want to include age in my regression. I have two approaches:
First approach is generating the variable age with values:
Then I ran two regressions and their respective marginal effects:
For the first case I got:
For the second case I got:
As you can see, the values are very similar, except for the 50s. Are these two approaches conceptually the same? If not, which one is better to use?
Thanks!
Li.
I'm working on a probit model, and I want to include age in my regression. I have two approaches:
First approach is generating the variable age with values:
20 if individual is 20 or youngerSecond approach is generating 5 dummies:
30 if individual is 30-39
40 if individual is 40-49
50 if individual is 50-59
60 if individual is 60 or older
age20 = 1 if individual is 20 or youngerThe dependent variable is APV3, which is a dummy.
age30s = 1 if individual is 30-39
age40s = 1 if individual is 40-49
age50s = 1 if individual is 50-59
age60plus = 1 if individual is 60 or older
Then I ran two regressions and their respective marginal effects:
Code:
probit APV3 i.age if affiliated==1 & retired==0 & education!=., robust margins, dydx(*) probit APV3 age30s age40s age50s age60plus if affiliated==1 & retired==0 & education!=., robust margins, dydx(*)
For the first case I got:
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Delta-method | dy/dx std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- age | 30 | .0900037 .0160503 5.61 0.000 .0585456 .1214618 40 | .1284201 .0158191 8.12 0.000 .0974154 .1594249 50 | .1111073 .0170309 6.52 0.000 .0777273 .1444872 60 | .0053756 .0222215 0.24 0.809 -.0381777 .048929 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the second case I got:
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Delta-method | dy/dx std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- age30s | .0971386 .0180418 5.38 0.000 .0617774 .1324998 age40s | .1344097 .0175642 7.65 0.000 .0999846 .1688349 age50s | -.0165766 .0133969 -1.24 0.216 -.0428341 .0096809 age60plus | .006348 .0261879 0.24 0.808 -.0449792 .0576753 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks!
Li.